Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Nairizi et al v. Blinken et al
as 3:2023cv00594
Plaintiff:
Ali Nairizi and Saeed Nairizi
Defendant:
Antony J. Blinken, Rena Bitter and Russel Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Shahrokhi v. Boutos et al
as 2:2023cv00671
Plaintiff:
Ali Shahrokhi
Defendant:
Nicholas B Boutos, Kenneth Bourne, Elizabeth Inskeep and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shahroki v. Throne et al
as 2:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Ali Shahroki
Defendant:
Dawn Throne, Elizabeth Scheinman and Azucena Zavala
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shahroki v. Hardesty
as 2:2021cv02251
Plaintiff:
Ali Shahroki
Defendant:
James W. Hardesty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shahroki v. Harter et al
as 2:2021cv01126
Defendant:
Marzola and Ruiz Law Group, Philip Spradling, Mathew Harter and others
Plaintiff:
Ali Shahroki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shahrokhi et al v. Harter
as 2:2021cv00557
Plaintiff:
Ali Shahroki, T. Matthew Phillips and Ali Shahrokhi
Defendant:
Mathew Harter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips et al v. Ochoa et al
as 2:2021cv00483
Defendant:
A.G. Aaron Ford, Vincent Ochoa, Mathew Harter and others
Plaintiff:
T. Matthew Phillips and Ali Shahrokhi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips et al v. Truby et al
as 2:2021cv00358
Defendant:
Suzy Truby, A.G. Aaron Ford and Julie Butler
Plaintiff:
T. Matthew Phillips and Ali Shahrokhi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips et al v. Duckworth et al
as 2:2020cv02345
Defendant:
Administrative Office of the Courts, Robin Sweet, Stephen Grierson and others
Plaintiff:
Ali Shahroki and T. Matthew Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shahrokhi v. Tao et al
as 2:2020cv02346
Defendant:
Bonnie A. Bulla, Michael P. Gibbons and Jerome T. Tao
Plaintiff:
Ali Shahrokhi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
