Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Local 169 Laborer International Union v. The Penta Building Group Inc
as 3:2020cv00356
Plaintiff:
Local 169 Laborer International Union of North Ame
Defendant:
The Penta Building Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00163
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Chatman v. Am Pm et al
as 2:2018cv01608
Defendant:
Am-Pm Corporation and Am Pm
Plaintiff:
Eric Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. AM/PM et al
as 2:2018cv00451
Defendant:
AM/PM, Bally's Casino Co and Chivas Regal Co
Plaintiff:
Eric Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins et al v. Teuton et al
as 2:2016cv02446
Defendant:
Frank Aguilar-Morfin, Jack B Ames, Carrie Black and others
Plaintiff:
Alisha Ruby Ortiz and Pele La Cruz Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
I-Am et al v. County of Clark et al
as 2:2016cv01631
Defendant:
Amerigas, JJ Casper, City of Las Vegas and others
Plaintiff:
Dinorah Barraza, Judith Yaneth Barraza, Miguel Barraza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Villela v. Ames et al
as 2:2014cv01277
Defendant:
Jack Ames, Linda Bell, Kristine Cornelius and others
Plaintiff:
Javier Alfredo Villela
Interested Party:
Bryon A. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
