Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
ROSSMANN v. SAPIN et al
as 1:2023cv03123
Plaintiff:
BRUD ROSSMANN
Defendant:
LINDA SAPIN, PHILIP PULASKI, JOHN MAXWELL FINLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00788
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
SIDAK v. U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
J. GREGORY SIDAK
Defendant:
U.S. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, DAVID S. JOHANSON, RHONDA K. SCHMIDTLEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
ETIENNE v. SANDERS et al
as 1:2022cv02509
Defendant:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SHEKAR v. DUFF et al
as 1:2022cv02123
Defendant:
STEVE GILMAN, JOAQUIN ARCHIVALDO GUZMAN, JAMES DUFF and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER SHEKAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PHILLIPS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
AMY PHILLIPS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
S. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
W. S., Wesley Sullivan, Ellen Sullivan and others
Defendant:
District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
