Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
De Avila v. Murphy et al
as 1:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Jamie de Avila
Defendant:
Timothy Murphy and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wolfe et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv15121
Plaintiff:
Blake Wolfe, Kelly Wolfe, Richard Lee and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, GUUARDA WORLD, Joanna Sobran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Kimbrell v. Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2022cv01401
Plaintiff:
Jody D Kimbrell and Jody Kimbrell
Defendant:
Housing and Urban Development, Bank of America, NA, Brian T Moyniham and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lipinski v. Castaneda et al
as 1:2022cv02596
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Lipinski
Defendant:
Alonso Castaneda, Jesus Avila, Tim Bolin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00570
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
E.R. v. TikTok, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02810
Plaintiff:
E.R., by and through L.H., K.M., D.M. and others
Defendant:
ByteDance, Inc. and TIKTOK, INC.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Misty Hong, A.R., through her mother and legal guardian Gilda Avila and A.S., through her mother and legal guardian Laurel Slothower
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Avila v. Villafuerte et al
as 2:2018cv02104
Plaintiff:
Edgar Avila
Defendant:
M Villafuerte, A Brown, A Emery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
