Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Watkins v. South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force et al
as 1:2024cv03555
Plaintiff:
Timothy Watkins
Defendant:
South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force, Village of Burnham, City of Oak Forest and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kimbrell v. Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2022cv01401
Plaintiff:
Jody D Kimbrell and Jody Kimbrell
Defendant:
Housing and Urban Development, Bank of America, NA, Brian T Moyniham and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bowens v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv00278
Defendant:
Police Officers, Sean Bottom, #18938, CITY OF CHICAGO and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Bowens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowen v. Illinois Corporation Service C
as 1:2020cv06936
Defendant:
Illinois Corporation Service C
Plaintiff:
Martha B Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07638
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanchez et al v. City of Chicago, a municipal corporation et al
as 1:2018cv08281
Defendant:
John Vereen, Roberta Bowen, City of Chicago, a municipal corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Alicia Sanchez and Francisco Marchan Huertas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAtee v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv06823
Plaintiff:
Ronnie L. McAtee
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and Nathan Bowens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00217
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Saunders v. Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv09158
Plaintiff:
Michael Saunders
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Kenneth Boudreau, Richard Paladino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
