Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Barberi v. Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC et al
as 0:2024cv61227
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
Bridgestone Retail Operations LLC a Foreign Limited Liability Company doing business as Tires Plus and Sun Enterprises Holding Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80944
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Williams v. Robinson et al
as 0:2024cv60899
Defendant:
Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC and Austin J. Robinson
Plaintiff:
Quantell W. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Robinson et al
as 1:2024cv21998
Defendant:
Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC and Austin J. Robinson
Plaintiff:
Quantell W. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv81058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Ray v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC
as 3:2020cv00857
Plaintiff:
DERRICK RAY
Defendant:
BRIDGESTONE RETAIL OPERATIONS, LLC d/b/a Tires Plus Total Car Care and Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC doing business as Tires Plus Total Car Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv14152
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv21478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
