Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WESLEY v. ESCAMBIA COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Shaquada Wesley
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA COUNTY, CHIP SIMMONS, Martin J Klee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ninth Amendment Party Association et al v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
Ninth Amendment Party Association and Milton Gerard Esquibel
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, Clovis Watson, Jr., Scotty Rhoden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LITTLE v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2023cv08835
Plaintiff:
NICOLE CHRISTIAN LITTLE and NICOLE CHRISTAN LITTLE
Defendant:
CHIP SIMMONS, DRAKE FAWCETT and TOMA CASTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SETTLE v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2022cv22688
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLEY DIANE SETTLE
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHIP SIMMONS, RAYMOND HART and DAVID COLLIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GAINES v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2022cv00635
Plaintiff:
RONNIE GAINES
Defendant:
CHIP SIMMONS, EMILEE BRIGHT, DRAKE FAWCETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SIMS v. BAISE et al
as 3:2021cv00987
Plaintiff:
SHANEKQUA SIMS
Defendant:
KIRSTYN LYNN BAISE, CHIP SIMMONS and ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORDQUIST v. MORGAN et al
as 3:2020cv05799
Defendant:
DAVID MORGAN and CHIP SIMMONS
Plaintiff:
ERIC NORDQUIST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARGNARE v. SHACKELFORD
as 3:2014cv00437
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE ALLEN BARGNARE
Defendant:
JAN SHACKELFORD, WILLIAM BILL EDDINS, MATT GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARGNARE v. SHACKELFORD
as 3:2014cv00438
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE BARGNARE
Defendant:
JAN SHACKELFORD, WILLIAM BILL EDDINS, MATT GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ADAMS v. CITY OF PENSACOLA FLORIDA et al
as 3:2012cv00580
Plaintiff:
BILL ADAMS
Defendant:
CITY OF PENSACOLA FLORIDA , CHIP SIMMONS and R EAGERTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
