Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Smith et al v. Wren
as 9:2024mc81074
Plaintiff:
Byron Evans, Jason DeRoche, Reginald Cleveland and others
Defendant:
Caroline Wren
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Henry v. Shepherd
as 9:2023cv80132
Plaintiff:
Nelson Henry
Defendant:
Caroline Cahill Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martino v. Bryanton et al
as 8:2022cv02811
Defendant:
Traci Bryanton, Traci Samuel, Traci Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Lesa Maria Martino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv14339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hall v. Santiago et al
as 1:2022cv22105
Plaintiff:
Kristian J. Hall
Defendant:
Edward Santiago, Dana Robin Goldman, Daniel Junior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Gruters et al
as 3:2021cv01209
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Roode A. Clervrain, Francis Osei-Fosu and others
Defendant:
Joe Gruters, Mike Arnold, Mike Beatty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. City of Cape Coral et al
as 2:2021cv00674
Plaintiff:
Arthur J Scott
Defendant:
City of Cape Coral, Florida, Anthony Sizemore, Humberto Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv14347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
