Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Do Not Pass Go LLC et al v. City of Rockford
as 1:2024cv01349
Plaintiff:
Do Not Pass Go LLC, Next Step Recovery Homes Inc., Jason Ridley and others
Defendant:
City of Rockford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Do Not Pass Go LLC et al v. City of Rockford
as 3:2024cv50074
Plaintiff:
Do Not Pass Go LLC, Next Step Recovery Homes Inc., Jason Ridley and others
Defendant:
City of Rockford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oxford House, Inc. v. City of Rockford, Illinois
as 3:2023cv50366
Plaintiff:
Oxford House, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Rockford, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Moton et al v. City of Rockford et al
as 3:2023cv50120
Plaintiff:
Teshayla Moton and Shenita Moton
Defendant:
City Of Rockford and J. Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore et al v. Lauer et al
as 3:2022cv50354
Plaintiff:
Stephene Moore and "PM"
Defendant:
Bradley Lauer, The City Of Rockford, Scott Dimke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv50196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Davis v. City of Rockford, Illinois et al
as 3:2022cv50145
Plaintiff:
Denise Davis
Defendant:
City of Rockford, Illinois and Anthony Curran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Redmond et al v. City Of Rockford et al
as 1:2021cv06742
Plaintiff:
Xavier Redmond, Natasha Hayward and Officer Josh Carpenter
Defendant:
City Of Rockford and Officer Irvin Benitez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Holliman v. City Of Rockford et al
as 3:2021cv50265
Plaintiff:
Anthony Holliman
Defendant:
City Of Rockford, Samual McNutt, Kevin Case and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv50242
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
