Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Azad v. Molina et al
as 1:2024cv01623
Plaintiff:
Mohammad A. Azad
Defendant:
Louis A. Molina, Benny Boscio, Solange N. Grey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Nelson v. Thomson et al
as 1:2023cv10379
Plaintiff:
Troix Nelson
Defendant:
Kat Thomson, Sherrie Rembert, Louis A. Molina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv08202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed
Uniformed Fire Officers Association et al v. DeBlasio et al
as 1:2020cv05441
Plaintiff:
Detectives Endowment Association of New York City, Uniformed Firefighters Association of Greater New York, Correction Officers Benevolent Association, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Bill DeBlasio, Civilian Complaint Review Board, New York City Police Department and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Sergeants Benevolent Association of the City of New York and BetaNYC
Amicus Curiae:
Girls for Gender Equity, Inc., New York Civil Liberties Union, Citizens Union/Citizens Union Foundation and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Communities United for Police Reform
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wong v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv05383
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Wong
Defendant:
Nadene M. Pinnock, Correction Officer's Benevolent Association, Inc. and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv09637
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
