Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04188
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Pitter v. Winnebago County et al
as 3:2024cv50105
Plaintiff:
Peyton Pitter
Defendant:
Winnebago County, Gary Caruana and Timothy Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Nevill et al v. Cox et al
as 3:2023cv03273
Plaintiff:
Douglas Nevill, Becky Nevill, Jordin Nevill and others
Defendant:
Dan W Cox, Suzanne Keller and Rochester CUSD 3A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv04975
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Bryan Cox, Peter Theodore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King Sykes LLC v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv01636
Plaintiff:
King Sykes LLC
Defendant:
The City of Chicago, Maurice Cox, Samir Mayekar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Adams et al v. Cook County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2023cv01390
Plaintiff:
Chatara Adams, Monica Aguilar, Carol Allen and others
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff's Office and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
