Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Runge v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv01328
Plaintiff:
Roger Runge
Defendant:
Chief Eric D. Smith, Deputy Chief Chad Ochivzzo, Supervisor Ashlee Windler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dublin et al v. The City of Orlando et al
as 6:2023cv01018
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Dublin, Gloria Dublin, Cynthia Dublin Clayton and others
Defendant:
The City of Orlando, Mayor Buddy Dyer, Commissioner Regina Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Econo Lodge Kissimee FL Owners et al
as 3:2019cv00599
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
Econo Lodge Fayettville Arkansas Owners, Econo Lodge Huntsville Alabama Owners, President Donald Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith v. City Rescue Mission et al
as 3:2019cv00526
Defendant:
Mr. Mills, Jane Doe, David the Maintenance Man and others
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Wyndham Hotels et al
as 3:2019cv00621
Defendant:
Baymont Elm Hill Pk, Days Inn, Slum Dog Millionaires and others
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. BB&T Bank et al
as 3:2019cv00647
Defendant:
West Chevrolet Aaron, BB&T Bank, L.A. Story and others
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. DAYS INN et al
as 4:2019cv00114
Defendant:
WYNDHAM INTER, PATEL and DAYS INN
Plaintiff:
JAMES D SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Seven Eleven Inc Assistant Manager
as 6:2017cv01155
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
Seven Eleven Inc Assistant Manager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rance v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2017cv80667
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Rance
Defendant:
Ric Bradshaw, D. Smith and Unknown Palm Beach Deputy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2016cv60596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
