Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Buckeye Community Hope Foundation v. Village of Tinley Park et al.
as 1:2016cv04430
Plaintiff:
Buckeye Community Hope Foundation and Buckeye Community Sixty Nine, LP
Defendant:
Village of Tinley Park , David G. Seaman , Brian H. Younker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tinleysparks, Inc et al v. Village of Tinley Park et al
as 1:2014cv00853
Plaintiff:
Tinleysparks, Inc , Stephen E Eberhardt and Karen Weigand
Defendant:
Village of Tinley Park, Edward J Zabrocki, Patrick E. Rea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Brien v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv04688
Plaintiff:
Michael O'Brien
Defendant:
City of Chicago , Laura T. Nutile , David G. Rak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv08712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lawton et al v. Village of Tinley Park et al
as 1:2010cv05763
Defendant:
Village of Tinley Park , Edward J Zabrocki , Patrick E. Rea and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Beth Lawton and John E. Horn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaFond v. City of Kankakee et al
as 2:2009cv02222
Plaintiff:
David G LaFond
Defendant:
City of Kankakee, City of Kankakee, City of Kankakee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Ducar et al
as 1:2007cv06334
Plaintiff:
John Henry Green, Jr.
Defendant:
David G. Ducar, John C. Kurnat and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stevens et al v. Slay et al
as 3:2007cv00790
Plaintiff:
Anthony Stevens and Solomon Leroy Rooks
Defendant:
Francis Slay, Gerard Nester, Joe Mokwa and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2006cv05257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
