Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04593
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Serkez v. Gov. Agencys et al
as 1:2022cv08013
Plaintiff:
Joseph Serkez
Defendant:
Gov. Agencys, Legislator, Empire State Dev. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frost v. National Security Agency et al
as 1:2021cv00436
Defendant:
NYC M.T.A., CVR Associates Inc., U.S. Senate and others
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Frost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Islam et al v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2020cv02328
Plaintiff:
New York Taxi Workers Alliance, MD Islam, DOH OUATTARA and others
Defendant:
New York State Department of Labor, Andrew Cuomo and Roberta Reardon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Burton v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv05345
Plaintiff:
Ann Burton
Defendant:
City of New York, Officer Crilly, Department of Health (DOH) and others
DEP:
Department of Environmental Protection
NYPD:
New York Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chalasani v. Daines et al
as 2:2010cv01978
Plaintiff:
Prasad Chalasani, M.D.
Defendant:
Commissioner, Dept. Of Health (DOH) State Of NY, Richard F. Daines, M.D., Antonia Novello, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chalasani v. Daines et al
as 1:2010cv03259
Plaintiff:
Prasad Chalasani, M.D.
Defendant:
Richard F. Daines, M.D., Commissioner, Dept. Of Health (DOH) State Of NY, Keith W. Servis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Papay v. Haselhuhn et al
as 1:2007cv03858
Plaintiff:
Donald Papay
Defendant:
Virginia Haselhuhn , American Registry Of Radiologic Technologists , Richard F. Daines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
