Cases 1 - 10 of 60
HARRISON v. AUSTIN
as 1:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
LORENZO HARRISON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
SHERVEN v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
as 1:2023cv03534
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW J. SHERVEN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TOOR et al v. BERGER et al
as 1:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
SUKHBIR SINGH TOOR, JASKIRAT SINGH, AEKASH SINGH and others
Defendant:
DAVID BERGER, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Religion
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01771
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KELLY v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCY AGENCY et al
as 1:2022cv03432
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS KELLY
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCY AGENCY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
