Civil Rights Cases filed in Illinois
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Oliver v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01114
Plaintiff: King Michael Oliver
Defendant: Illinois Department of Health and Family Services, Dan Gobert, Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richmond v. Internal Revenue Service Federal Payment Levy Program et al
as 1:2017cv08263
Plaintiff: Brady L Richmond
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service Federal Payment Levy Program and Department of Treasury Financial Management Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis et al v. Larry et al
as 3:2016cv03199
Plaintiff: James D Lewis, F.B.I., Barack Obama and others
Defendant: United States of America, Department of Treasury, Bruce Rauner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Trotter v. Ill. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2015cv00100
Plaintiff: Peggy Richmond Trotter
Defendant: Ill. Social Security Administration , Department of Treasury- Fiscal Services , Internal Revenue Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheaton College v. Sebelius, Sec of US Dept of Health & Human Servs. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv08910
Plaintiff: Wheaton College
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius, Sec of US Dept of Health & Human Servs., United States Department of Health and Human Services, Thomas E Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Korte et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv01072
Plaintiff: Cyril B. Korte , Jane E. Korte and Korte & Luitjohan Contractors, Inc.
Defendant: United States Department of Health and Human Services , Kathleen Sebelius , United States Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Salah et al v. United States Department of Treasury et al
as 1:2012cv07067
Plaintiff: Muhammad Salah , American Friends Service Committee and American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee
Defendant: United States Department of Treasury , Timothy F. Geithner and Adam Szubin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Catholic Diocese of Peoria v. Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01276
Plaintiff: Catholic Diocese of Peoria
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Hilda Solis, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor, Timothy Geithner, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
R. Daniel Conlon, Bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Joliet, Illinois, as Successor Trustee Under the Provisions of the Trust Agreement Dated December 31, 1949 et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Departm Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv03932
Plaintiff: R. Daniel Conlon, Bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Joliet, Illinois, as Successor Trustee Under the Provisions of the Trust Agreement Dated December 31, 1949, Catholic Charities Diocese of Joliet, Inc., The Most Reverend Thomas John Paprocki, Roman Catholic Bishop of the Diocese of Springfield-in-Illinois and others
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Hilda Solis, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor, Timothy Geithner, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae: American Center For Law & Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv09021
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?