Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Calisi v. D'ESPOSITO
as 6:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Dillon James Calisi
Defendant:
SCOTT D'ESPOSITO
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514 Civil Action to Restrain Harassment of a Victim or Witness
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Martin et al v Snyder et al
as 2:2021cv14469
Plaintiff:
Mr. Bradley Martin, Matthew Crull, Kristin Schmier and others
Defendant:
William D. Snyder and Steven O'Leary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARR v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD & NUTRITION SERVICES
as 3:2020cv05455
Plaintiff:
DILLON MCDOUGLAS BARR, JR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD & NUTRITION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dillon v. Sumter County DOC
as 5:2020cv00101
Plaintiff:
Hunter Dwain Dillon
Defendant:
Sumter County DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEBB v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2019cv00975
Defendant:
SHERIFF MARK A. HUNTER, JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
DILLON S. WEBB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA INC et al v. DETZNER
as 4:2018cv00251
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA INC , MEGAN NEWSOME , AMOL JETHWANI and others
Defendant:
KENNETH W DETZNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Silcox v. Hunter et al
as 3:2016cv01509
Plaintiff:
Eaan Silcox
Defendant:
Mark Hunter and Dillon Wesley Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mazzoni et al v. Halpern et al
as 6:2009cv00225
Plaintiff:
Paul T. Mazzoni, NSC Automotive, L.L.C., Dillon Mazzoni and others
Defendant:
Michael Halpern, Robert Rose, Cristina Rose and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
