Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Giscombe v. U.S. Department of Housing et al
as 6:2023cv02188
Plaintiff:
Mishael Giscombe
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Housing, Santa Ana Field Office Director, Newark Field Office Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ibrahim v. Assistant Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2017cv24574
Plaintiff:
Farah Ibrahim , Ibrahim Musa , Khalid Abdallah Mohmed and others
Defendant:
Assistant Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement , Sheriff of Glades County , Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Miami Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morgan v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2014cv00643
Plaintiff:
Andrea Morgan
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Homeland Security and Field Office Director, Citizenship and Immigration Services, Orlando, Florida
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446
Gupta v. Trial Attorney, United States Department of Justice et al
as 6:2012cv01097
Plaintiff:
Anesh Gupta
Defendant:
Lana L. Vahab, J. Max Weintraub, Assistant Director Office of Immigration Litigation United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manouni v. Secretary, Department of Homeland Security et al
as 6:2008cv02166
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director, Citizenship and Immigration Services, Interim Field Office Director, Citizenship and Immigration Services, Tampa, Florida and others
Plaintiff:
Redouane Manouni
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Khan v. USCIS Field Office Director et al
as 6:2007cv00247
Plaintiff:
Irshad Noor Khan
Defendant:
USCIS Field Office Director, USCIS Director Emilio Gonzalez, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
