Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00079
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Other:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01657
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Caplan v. CGC INDUSTRIES INC. et al
as 0:2022cv61386
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
CGC INDUSTRIES INC. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as CITY GLASS and ROBERT J. PANDOS and FRANCES PANDOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
ZIEGENHORN v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
as 3:2022cv05981
Plaintiff:
ANNE FRANCES ZIEGENHORN
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, US BANK TRUST FOR LSF9 TRUST MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST, ERIC SCOTT ADEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lyons v. France et al
as 3:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
James Lyons
Defendant:
Christopher A. France, Laura M. Steiner and Ellen Whitton Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Setney v. France
as 3:2021cv01105
Plaintiff:
Brittney Setney
Defendant:
Christopher France
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
