Cases 1 - 10 of 455
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv14141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
FDMH LLC v. Volusia County Building and Code Administration et al
as 6:2023cv02431
Plaintiff:
FDMH LLC
Defendant:
Volusia County Building and Code Administration, Kerry Leuzinger, George Recktenwald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fernandez et al v. Menocal et al
as 1:2023cv24142
Plaintiff:
David Fernandez and Carla Fernandez
Defendant:
N.S. Menocal, B.A. Maizo, M.A. Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
STONER v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
as 1:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BENJAMIN STONER
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and GARDY LAROCHELLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
