Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
El Dey v. University of Kansas Hospital, The et al
as 2:2014cv02522
Plaintiff:
Emalin S.I. Peleyah El Dey
Defendant:
University of Kansas Hospital, The, Bob Page, Chris Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Yousif et al v. Mukasey et al
as 2:2008cv02019
Plaintiff:
Haidar Abdul Yousif and Lina Jawad Karim
Defendant:
Michael B. Mukasey, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Singh v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv02428
Plaintiff:
Harmail Singh
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Emilio Gonzalez, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Wang v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv02272
Plaintiff:
Qinghui Wang
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Michael Jaromin and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Hajjaj v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv02262
Plaintiff:
Samer Hajjaj
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez, Dr and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Shah v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv02205
Plaintiff:
Pir A Shah
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Gerard Heinauer and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
