Cases 1 - 10 of 304
PARKER v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY PARKER
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, ROBERT CONTEE, METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00329
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
GREGORY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv03443
Plaintiff:
MS. CHE' GREGORY and CHE' GREGORY
Defendant:
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, MURIEL BOWSER, DC GOVERNMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DEAN v. NOOR et al
as 1:2023cv02331
Plaintiff:
HESHAM DEAN
Defendant:
RIZWANA NOOR and UNKNOWN GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HARDRICK v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv02151
Plaintiff:
CORTEZ HARDRICK
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
