Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Romero v. Adams County et al
as 1:2021cv02806
Plaintiff:
Jason Romero
Defendant:
Adams County, Richard Reigenborn, Ian Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vigil v. Douglas County School District Board of Education et al
as 1:2021cv02537
Plaintiff:
Scott Richard Vigil
Defendant:
Douglas County School District Board of Education, Corey Wise, Corey (I) Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flynn v. Hanson et al
as 1:2021cv01863
Defendant:
Terisa Hanson, Terri Lynn Hanson, Angela Sparks and others
Plaintiff:
Kristin Flynn
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1201
Alire et al v. Wihera et al
as 1:2021cv00774
Defendant:
Thomas Nelson, Thomas (I) Wihera, City of Grand Junction and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Alire and Arlinda Alire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson et al v. Larimer County et al
as 1:2020cv00317
Defendant:
Neil Baker, Stephen Wicker, Stephen (I) Wicker and others
Plaintiff:
Rosma Lynn Walker, Brett Alan Hanson and The Estate of Dorothy Evenlyn Felt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nesdore et al v. Adams County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2013cv00267
Plaintiff:
Debra Nesdore , Devin Nesdore and Von A. Nesdore
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff's Office , Sara Hanson and Douglas N. Darr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
