Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Holmes v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Larry Holmes
Defendant:
City of Chicago, David Hodgeman, B. J. Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Sight et al
as 1:2023cv17013
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Holmes
Defendant:
Latilda Sight, Aaron Pennix, University of Chicago Woodlawn Charter School and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Discrimination in Federally-Funded Education Program
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Butler v. Holmes
as 1:2023cv01460
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Butler
Defendant:
Chicago Police Sergeant Michael Holmes, Star No. 1599 and Michael Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv05902
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Holmes
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Former Police Sgt. Ronald Watts, Former CPD Officer Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
