Civil Rights Cases filed in Florida
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Petricca v. Saxony Condominium Association, Inc et al
as 9:2023cv81581
Plaintiff: Bruce Petricca
Defendant: SAXONY CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., TODD HOOPER, CARMINE COLELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
White v. City of Deltona et al
as 6:2021cv00750
Defendant: Anita Bradford, Marsha Segal-George, Maritza Avila Vazquez and others
Plaintiff: Brandy L. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooper v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 8:2021cv00160
Defendant: Sam's East, Inc. d/b/a Sam's Club and Sam's East, Inc. doing business as Sam's Club
Plaintiff: Will Hooper
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hooper et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
as 5:2018cv00151
Plaintiff: Yonnette Hooper , Martin Emanuel and Makini Hooper
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd v. Seagraves et al
as 3:2015cv01362
Plaintiff: Orvel Lloyd
Defendant: Tommy Seagraves, M. Delacruz, D. Hickox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00038
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Richards v. The City of Lauderhill, a Florida Municipal corporation et al
as 0:2012cv61689
Plaintiff: Rodney Richards
Defendant: The City of Lauderhill , Mark Abrahams and Austin Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geneus v. Hooper et al
as 0:2012cv60296
Plaintiff: Viergela Geneus
Defendant: Austin Hooper and City of Lauderhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADLEY v. BEARD We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00394
Plaintiff: RUSSELL W BRADLEY and OPAL LAVONIA PITTS
Defendant: LISA BEARD, DANNY CROSS, FRED GERSON LEVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BRADLEY v. HOOPER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00275
Plaintiff: RUSSELL WILLIAM BRADLEY
Defendant: BRIAN JAMES HOOPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?