Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Subject ID: 176-17887 v. Zimmer et al
as 2:2022cv14412
Plaintiff:
Subject ID: 176-17887 and Occupant
Defendant:
Jennifer Zimmer, Eli Lilly And Company, RJ Raffa INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLECTIVELY doing business as Radiology Imaging Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Barberi v. FRIENDLY MOTORS OF S FLORIDA LLC et al
as 1:2022cv23552
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
FRIENDLY MOTORS OF S FLORIDA LLC a Florida Limited Liability Company doing business as WORLD AUTO CARE and IDS INVESTMENTS LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Barberi v. FRIENDLY MOTORS OF S FLORIDA LLC et al
as 1:2022cv23550
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
FRIENDLY MOTORS OF S FLORIDA LLC a Florida Limited Liability Company doing business as WORLD AUTO CARE and IDS INVESTMENTS LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Candio v. Francois, et al.
as 3:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Candio
Defendant:
Louna Francois and JSO ID 618360
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Prince v. IDES et al
as 0:2021cv60575
Defendant:
DEO, Chelsea Doe, Terry Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Prince
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv60581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Saleh v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2017cv01465
Defendant:
Susan Pniewski, Sheriff's Office, Derek Bermudez and others
Plaintiff:
Mohamed O. Saleh, VNS, IDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FURLOW v. ID RECORDS
as 4:2013cv00489
Plaintiff:
ELGINE WILSON FURLOW
Defendant:
ID RECORDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
