Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, et al v. Raul Labrador, et al
as 23-35518
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST, HAWAII, ALASKA, INDIANA, KENTUCKY, On Behalf of Itself, It's Staff, Physicians and Patients, CAITLIN GUSTAFSON, On Behalf of Herself and Her Patients and DARIN WEYHRICH, On Behalf of Himself and His Patients
Defendant / Appellant:
RAUL R. LABRADOR, In His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Idaho
Defendant:
MEMBERS OF THE IDAHO STATE BOARD OF MEDICINE, IDAHO STATE BOARD OF NURSING, In Their Official Capacities, COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS, In Their Official Capacities and others
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky et al v. Labrador et al
as 1:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood Great Northwest, Hawaii, Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky, Caitlin Gustafson and Darin Weyhrich
Defendant:
Raul Labrador, Members of the Idaho State Board of Medicine, Idaho State Board of Nursing and others
Amicus Curiae:
St. Luke's Health System Ltd., State of Arizona, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands et al v. Wasden et al
as 1:2018cv00319
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands
Defendant:
Jill Holinka, Andrew Doman, Daniel Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands v. Wasden et al
as 1:2015cv00557
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood of the Great Northwest and the Hawaiian Islands
Defendant:
Lawrence G Wasden , Jan M. Bennetts , Grant P Loebs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Satterfield v. Idaho State Board of Medicine
as 1:2009cv00470
Plaintiff:
Cynthia S Satterfield
Defendant:
Idaho State Board of Medicine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
