Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01364
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Riley v. Marceno et al
as 2:2023cv00981
Plaintiff:
Mark P. Riley
Defendant:
Carmine Marceno, Carmine Marceno, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Lee County, Florida, Charles Custodio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv24910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cepek v. Israel et al
as 0:2017cv62455
Plaintiff:
William Cepek
Defendant:
Scott Israel and Jovian Irizarry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SAMPSON et al v. CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS et al
as 1:2013cv24312
Plaintiff:
EARL SAMPSON , TOREE M DANIELS , ANTHONY LOWERY and others
Defendant:
CITY OF MIAMI GARDENS , OLIVER G GILBERT, III , SHIRLEY GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irizarry et al v. Department of Children and Families
as 2:2011cv00595
Plaintiff:
Stacia Ann Irizarry and Raul Irizarry
Defendant:
Department of Children and Families
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz Nieves v. Irizarry et al
as 6:2011cv01505
Plaintiff:
Rafael Angel Diaz Nieves
Defendant:
Edna Irizarry, Dilia Carrasquillo and Felicia Marie Therm Blow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Diaz Nieves v. Irizarry et al
as 6:2011cv01471
Plaintiff:
Rafael Angel Diaz Nieves
Defendant:
Edna Irizarry, Tracie Phillips-Morgan, Foye Buchannon Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv00880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
