Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mathis v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04278
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Mathis
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, R. Collins, M. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perkins v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv04603
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Perkins
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Former CPD Sergeant Ronald Watts, Kallatt Mohammed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brinkley v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv04256
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Brinkley
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Serguey Klemens and Mario Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stamps v. City of Chicago, Illinois, The et al
as 1:2019cv06663
Defendant:
James Radomski (#19133), City Of Chicago, Anthony Accardo (#10627) and others
Plaintiff:
Justice Stamps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boatman et al v. Muhammad et al
as 1:2018cv04237
Plaintiff:
Eric Boatman and Carol Jarvis
Defendant:
Ramon McCalpine, Harvey Police Detective York, Robert Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McIntosh v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv06357
Plaintiff:
Norman McIntosh
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chester Bach, David Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wardlow v. Fairley et al
as 1:2015cv03637
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Wardlow
Defendant:
Daryl Fairley and Village Of Maywood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv07307
Plaintiff:
Necia Alexander , Jarvis Alexander , Tondra Kornegay and others
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Unknown Chicago Police Officer and Lawrence Bond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
