Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Winkler, et al. v. Payne, et al.
as 3:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Michelle Kirby Winkler, Yvonne Kay Peterson, Jeremy Carroll Akdison and others
Defendant:
Jeff P. Payne, Kathy M. Ackerman, Nikki Sickels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Nicholas Jones for Congress et al
as 1:2020cv00241
Plaintiff:
Lawerence Denney, Idaho Secretary of State and Nicholas Jones for Congress
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Nicholas Jones for Congress et al v. Idaho Secretary of State et al
as 1:2020cv00242
Defendant:
Idaho Secretary of State and Lawerence Denney
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Jones for Congress
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Pringle v. Fruchtenicht, et al.
as 1:2019cv00408
Defendant:
Sylvia Diaz, Christopher Smalling, Judy Mesick and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela D Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gant v. Idaho Veteran's Network et al
as 1:2018cv00503
Defendant:
Department of Health & Welfare Staff, Wal-Mart of Boise, 4th District Court and others
Plaintiff:
Jace Russell Gant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pringle v. Gentry et al
as 1:2018cv00347
Defendant:
Cindy McDonald, Judy Mesick, Shannon Cluney and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Denise Pringle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fletcher v. Idaho Department of Correction et al
as 1:2018cv00267
Plaintiff:
William Fletcher
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Correction, Idaho Commission of Pardon & Parole, Sandy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Collis v. Epis et al
as 4:2016cv00483
Plaintiff:
Colt Esmond Collis
Defendant:
David Epis, Michael Oths, Ryan Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
