Civil Rights Cases filed in District of Columbia
ETIENNE v. SANDERS et al
as 1:2022cv02509
Defendant: KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Plaintiff: DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
JOLLY v. GEIB et al
as 1:2022cv00422
Plaintiff: MAKETA JOLLY
Defendant: GLEN GEIB, JOSH LITCHBLAU, JOANNE LEONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH v. BOWSER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02710
Defendant: MURIEL BOWSER and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff: CAPITOL HILL BAPTIST CHURCH
Amicus Curiae: KEVIN CRAMER, RAND PAUL, CINDY HYDE-SMITH and others
Interested Party: USA UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRELL v. SPARKMAN et al
as 1:2019cv02269
Defendant: STATE OF TENNESSEE, TENNESSEE HIGHWAY PATROL ADMINISTRATION, JAMIE GIBSON and others
Plaintiff: JAMES EVERETT FERRELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
YUN v. CITY OF STROUDSBURG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv01194
Plaintiff: GLORIA SUN JUNG YUN
Defendant: CITY OF STROUDSBURG, CHIEF DIRECTOR, CYNTHIA TALAMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00808
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
RONET v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00850
Plaintiff: JEAN-PIERRE RONET
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT TAMPA DIVISION, SHERYL L. LOESCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00106
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?