Cases 1 - 10 of 84
HYLTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03732
Plaintiff:
KAREN HYLTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MURIEL BOWSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HYLTON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2023cv03054
Plaintiff:
KAREN HYLTON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, BRITTANY NYAMEKYE, STRANEIKA PROCTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HYLTON v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2023cv03654
Plaintiff:
KAREN HYLTON
Defendant:
MURIEL BOWSER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, BRITTANY NYAMEKYE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
FLANNERY et al v. ECKENWILER et al
as 1:2023cv02804
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. FLANNERY and DRANE FLANNERY RESTAURANT, LLC
Defendant:
MARK ECKENWILER, KAREN WIRT, CHRISTINE HEALEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CHOI v. JADDOU et al
as 1:2023cv01518
Plaintiff:
JAE YOUNG CHOI
Defendant:
USCIS IMMIGRANT INVESTOR PROGRAM OFFICE, USCIS, US DEPARMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
