Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
OLSEN v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2022cv00807
Plaintiff:
KURT B. OLSEN
Defendant:
NANCY PELOSI, Hon. BENNIE G. THOMPSON, ELIZABETH L. CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01831
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
KANAM v. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00340
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, CITY OF TUMWATER and OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Plaintiff:
KURT KANAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KANAM v. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY et al
as 1:2020cv00123
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF LAW, OFFICE OF MATHEW FLETCHER, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN and others
Plaintiff:
KURT KANAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MADSEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv03330
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
KURT R. MADSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUMPHRIES v. NEWMAN et al
as 1:2018cv02936
Defendant:
ALEXANDER CHERI RUCKER, ASHLEY GARDELLA, KURT NEWMAN and others
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE R. HUMPHRIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv02365
Plaintiff:
AZAEL D. PERALES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DONALD JOHN TRUMP, JOSEPH DUNFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
