Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pfuetze v. Workforce Alliance of South Central Kansas et al
as 6:2019cv01112
Defendant:
Edward G. Naasz, Cherokee, County of, Tonya Reed and others
Plaintiff:
John Pfuetze
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Elkins v. Yoder et al
as 5:2018cv04129
Plaintiff:
Sharon E. Elkins
Defendant:
Law Office of Michael J. Studtmann, P.A., Michael J. Studtmann, Law Office of Jay G. Horvath, Chtd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Elkins v. Yoder et al
as 5:2018cv04029
Plaintiff:
Sharon E. Elkins
Defendant:
Rickey D. Yoder, Yoder Embalming Services, LLC, Michael J. Studtmann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv04012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Pistotnik Law et al
as 6:2018cv01048
Plaintiff:
Marie A. Anderson
Defendant:
Pistotnik Law, Brian R. Collignon, Henry and Mathewson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Coleman et al
as 6:2015cv01215
Plaintiff:
Kelvin H. Turner
Defendant:
Angela Y. Coleman, Harold Flaigle, Kansas Legal Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Paolucci v. Render, Kamas Law Firm and all partners from 1995 to the present
as 6:2012cv01253
Plaintiff:
Barbara Paolucci
Defendant:
Render Kamas Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kiley et al v. Lord et al
as 2:2011cv02516
Plaintiff:
James E. Kiley, Jr. and Kiley Law Firm, LLC, The
Defendant:
Carol W. Lord, State of Kansas, The , Kansas Department of Labor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
