Cases 1 - 10 of 372
Bishop v. CPO Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01182
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lee Bishop
Defendant:
CPO Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Meakens v. Walsh et al
as 1:2023cv17164
Plaintiff:
Lamar M Meakens
Defendant:
Ann Celine O'Hallare Walsh, Lee J. Roupas and Candice Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benitez v. Bogucki et al
as 1:2023cv16896
Plaintiff:
Francisco Benitez
Defendant:
Jerome Bogucki, Raymond Schalk, Paul Zacharias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Avitia v. City Of Chicago, et al
as 1:2023cv15957
Plaintiff:
Christian Avitia
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Bernard Lee Jr., Tim Tully and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wolfe et al v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv15121
Plaintiff:
Blake Wolfe, Kelly Wolfe, Richard Lee and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, GUUARDA WORLD, Joanna Sobran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Harris v. Zuley et al
as 1:2023cv14220
Plaintiff:
Lee Harris
Defendant:
Richard Zuley, James Ward, John McHugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Weeks et al
as 3:2023cv03120
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Cheri Weeks, Monica A. Stump, Donald J. Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Facebook et al
as 3:2023cv03064
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Facebook, Meta, Rudy Giuliani and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
