Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Stovall v. Lightfoot et al
as 1:2023cv01761
Plaintiff:
Grace L Stovall
Defendant:
Lori Lightfoot, City Of Chicago, City Of Chicago Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Earley v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv00801
Plaintiff:
Dakotah Earley
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Lori Lightfoot, David O. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jackson v. Village of Lansing et al
as 1:2022cv06868
Plaintiff:
Lori M. Jackson
Defendant:
Village of Lansing, Officer Catron Star No. 375, Officer Catron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
St. Adalbert's Rosary Group v. Lightfoot et al
as 1:2022cv06573
Plaintiff:
St. Adalbert's Rosary Group
Defendant:
Lori Lightfoot and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. Lightfoot et al
as 1:2022cv04533
Plaintiff:
William J. Kelly
Defendant:
Mayor of Chicago Lori Elaine Lightfoot and David Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
