Cases 1 - 10 of 177
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
De Avila v. Murphy et al
as 1:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Jamie de Avila
Defendant:
Timothy Murphy and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Avitia v. City Of Chicago, et al
as 1:2023cv15957
Plaintiff:
Christian Avitia
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Bernard Lee Jr., Tim Tully and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Miles v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv04193
Plaintiff:
Harry Edwin Miles
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Dara L Darrow, Joe Billy McDade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Li et al v. CITY OF CHICAGO et al
as 1:2023cv15485
Plaintiff:
Dongping Li, Xiaozhen Mai, Patrick McGuire and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Mayor Brandon Johnson, Commissioner Matthew Beaudet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Angers et al v. Chavez et al
as 1:2023cv02242
Plaintiff:
Megan Angers, Jamey Arnold, Adriana Antunez and others
Defendant:
#14182 Jesse Chavez, #5442 Mark Styczynski, #3809 Kyle Gleeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Acevedo v. Wolfe et al
as 1:2023cv01092
Plaintiff:
Dominique C. Acevedo
Defendant:
Mark D. Wolfe and Lexi Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bess et al v. State of Illinois et al
as 1:2022cv03939
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Bess
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Jr Ernest J Codilis, Jason Shulman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
