Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Tapanga Hardeman v. David Wathen, et al
as 18-2672
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TAPANGA HARDEMAN
Defendant - Appellant:
LAKE COUNTY, ILLINOIS, LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, DAVID WATHEN, Chief and others
Lara v. Curran et al
as 1:2016cv02408
Plaintiff:
Jorge Lara
Defendant:
Mark C. Curran, Jr., Lake County, Kondaur Capital Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Libby v. Lowe et al
as 1:2013cv08895
Plaintiff:
Steven Libby
Defendant:
Kevin Lowe and Mark C Curran, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Senalan v. Curran et al
as 1:2013cv05161
Plaintiff:
Hakan Senalan
Defendant:
Mark C. Curran, Jr., W.R. Kinville, Terry King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Testa, et al v. County of Lake, et al.,
as 1:2012cv00435
Plaintiff:
Vincent Testa , Kathleen Testa and Carl Testa
Defendant:
County of Lake, Mark C. Curran, Jr., Ashley Pomazal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv07808
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hobbs v. Cappelluti et al
as 1:2010cv07649
Plaintiff:
Jerry Hobbs
Defendant:
Domenic Cappelluti, Charles Schletz, William Valko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lisa Williamson v. Mark Curran, Jr., et al
as 09-3985
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LISA WILLIAMSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK C. CURRAN, JR., Sheriff of Lake County, MARTA SCHROEDER, CHRISTINE CAPUSON and others
Williamson v. Curran et al
as 1:2009cv00562
Plaintiff:
Lisa Williamson
Defendant:
Mark C. Curran, Jr., Ted Sittig, Anthony Fanella and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Arias-Cruz v. Village of Gurnee, Lake County et al
as 1:2008cv05462
Plaintiff:
Javier Arias-Cruz, Javier Arias-Cruz, Javier Arias-Cruz and others
Defendant:
Village of Gurnee, Michael J Waller, Robert Jones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
