Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Morfin v. Cassidy et al
as 1:2021cv05525
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Morfin
Defendant:
Scott Cassidy, Neil Linehan, Colleen Hyland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Det. Evangelides #20526 et al
as 1:2021cv04356
Plaintiff:
Lee Hall
Defendant:
Det. Evangelides #20526, P.O. Davoren #19446, P.O. Nash #4836 and others
Interpleader:
Law Office of C.N. Norris, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sopron v. Cassidy et al
as 1:2019cv08254
Defendant:
Unknown Employees of the City of Chicago, Thomas Ptak, K. Maicke and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sopron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04128
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Maxson v. Dwyer et al
as 1:2016cv09417
Plaintiff:
Mark Maxson
Defendant:
James Dwyer, John Duffy, William Marley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whirl v. Pienta et al
as 1:2016cv02557
Plaintiff:
Shawn Whirl
Defendant:
James Pienta, William Marley and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caine v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv08996
Plaintiff:
Eric Caine
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Jon Burge , James Pienta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booker v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2011cv00732
Defendant:
The City of Chicago , William Brogan , T. Vovos and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Booker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Burge, et al
as 1:2003cv04433
Plaintiff:
Aaron Patterson and Demitrus Evans
Petitioner:
Wallace Bradley, Ravitz & Palles, P.C., Michael Kill and others
Defendant:
Jon Burge, John Byrne, James Pienta and others
Respondent:
George H Ryan, Sr. and George H. Ryan, Sr.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Attorney Andrea Elizabeth Gambino and Barry & Loewy LLP Avila & Tomic LLC
Claimant:
Stanley L Hill
Intervenor:
Locke E Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
