Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv04505
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00359
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06908
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bueno v. City Of New York, et al
as 1:2015cv05513
Defendant:
Alejandro Rivas, Michael McDonnell and City of New York
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Bueno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02693
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Walrond et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv03033
Defendant:
City of New York, Trebor Evans and Thomas McDonnell
Plaintiff:
Nigel Phillip and Terrell Walrond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schrader v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv01995
Plaintiff:
Shawn Schrader
Defendant:
The City of New York, A. Jones, Dante Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Estate of Daniel McDonnell et al v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2011cv04221
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, Multiple Suffolk County Police Officers and Suffolk County Police Department
Plaintiff:
Estate of Daniel McDonnell, Danielle McDonnell and Devon McDonnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv09879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
