Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Molina v. S&S Truck Parts, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04698
Plaintiff:
Yeni Molina
Defendant:
S&S Truck Parts, LLC and Esau Hernandez Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Moreno v. Inv. Converse et al
as 1:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Cesar Moreno
Defendant:
Inv. Converse, Inv. Young, Inv. Martin and others
Intervenor:
The Law Office of C.N. Norris, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darko v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv06467
Plaintiff:
Ernest K Darko
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Anfernee Ixcot, Jose Roman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moreno v. Cook County for the City of Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv04928
Defendant:
CCDHSEM, Housing Authority of Cook County, Judicial Courts of the State of Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Jose Moreno
Bey v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv03377
Plaintiff:
Michael Moreno Bey
Defendant:
J R Lenski, G. Calderon, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strauss v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv05348
Plaintiff:
Brian J. Strauss
Defendant:
City Of Chicago , City of Chicago's Committee on Zoning. Landmarks and Buildiing Standards and Proco Joe Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berberena v. Illinois State Police et al
as 1:2016cv08380
Plaintiff:
Alexi Berberena
Defendant:
Inspector Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez et al v. City of Chicago
as 1:2016cv04747
Plaintiff:
Irma Gonzalez and Analelly Moreno
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv09871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
