Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carter v. Kenison et al
as 2:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
CLAY JAMES CARTER
Defendant:
TRAVIS MARVIN KENISON, ZERA AUGUSTUS ROWLEY and CHASE NATHAN OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zloza v. The Industrial Company et al
as 4:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Joseph Zloza
Defendant:
The Industrial Company, Nathan Miller and Justin LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Snyder v. Bagley
as 4:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Raymond Max Snyder
Defendant:
Judge Marvin Bagley, Marvin Bagley, American Family Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Cache County et al
as 1:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Doug Williams
Defendant:
Cache County, D. Chad Jensen, Lower Foods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bloomquist v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2022cv00659
Plaintiff:
Darrell Bloomquist
Defendant:
State of Utah, Leonard Isaacson, Mark Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Stone v. Provo City Utah et al
as 2:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Nathan Stone
Defendant:
Provo City Utah, Provo City Police Department, Ross John Gyerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
