Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gibbs v. Oklahoma Vision Development Center Inc., P.C.
as 4:2021cv00415
Plaintiff:
Lakyra Gibbs
Defendant:
Oklahoma Vision Development Center Inc., P.C. doing business as Harrel Eyecare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Vitt v. Koons Fuller, P.C. et al
as 4:2018cv00493
Defendant:
Alagood Cartwright Burke, P.C., Bruce McFarling, Jackson and Hagen and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Alan Vitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C. et al
as 4:2018cv00064
Plaintiff:
Christopher Barnett
Defendant:
Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Golden & Nelson, P.C. , J Patrick Cremin , Johnathan L Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Coons et al
as 4:2016cv00217
Plaintiff:
Roy L Jackson
Defendant:
Richard Coons and David M. Dryer & Dryer & Associates P.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Collins v. Scott Lowery Law Office P.C. et al
as 4:2012cv00533
Plaintiff:
Karl Collins
Defendant:
Scott Lowery Law Office P.C. , Nicholas M Tait , Jessica L Tait and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mooney v. Tulsa Pain Consultants, Inc., P.C.
as 4:2008cv00746
Plaintiff:
Rosalee R Mooney and Rosalee R Mooney
Defendant:
Tulsa Pain Consultants, Inc., P.C.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
