Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Li et al v. CITY OF CHICAGO et al
as 1:2023cv15485
Plaintiff:
Dongping Li, Xiaozhen Mai, Patrick McGuire and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Mayor Brandon Johnson, Commissioner Matthew Beaudet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv04049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Moustakas v. Bryant et al
as 1:2014cv09294
Plaintiff:
Fotios Moustakas
Defendant:
Robinzina Bryant , Sergio Acosta , James Cavanaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeServi v. Bryant et al
as 1:2014cv03881
Plaintiff:
Ronald DeServi
Defendant:
Robinzina Bryant , Sergio Acosta , James Cavanaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ghantous v. Illinois Concealed Carry Licensing Review Board et al
as 1:2014cv03544
Plaintiff:
Seth Ghantous
Defendant:
Illinois Concealed Carry Licensing Review Board, Robinzina Bryant, Sergio Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Illinois State Rifle Association et al v. Grau et al
as 1:2014cv03064
Plaintiff:
Illinois State Rifle Association and Steven Charles Thomas
Defendant:
Hiram Grau , Sergio Acosta , Robinzina Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Baccus et al
as 1:2013cv08584
Plaintiff:
David Harris
Defendant:
Larissa Baccus, John Rotunno, Kevin Cronin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv50048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
