Cases 1 - 10 of 15
James-Irvin et al v. Buffalo Police Department, et al
as 2:2023cv01237
Plaintiff:
Keita M. James-Irvin, William W. Morris Jr. and Jazmin Morris
Defendant:
Buffalo Police Department, Alvin Robinson, Pete Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
WILLIAMS v. PELOSI
as 4:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
JUDITH MARCIA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
NANCY PELOSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHASE v. PELOSI et al
as 5:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
LINDA CHASE
Defendant:
NANCY PELOSI, MERRICK GARLAND, JASON COODY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHASE v. PELOSI et al
as 3:2022cv17729
Plaintiff:
LINDA CHASE
Defendant:
NANCY PELOSI, US Attorney General MERRICK GARLAND, JASON COODY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flynn v. Pelosi et al
as 8:2021cv02956
Plaintiff:
Michael Flynn
Defendant:
Nancy Pelosi, Bennie G. Thompson, Elizabeth L. Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SMITH v. PELOSI et al
as 4:2021cv00030
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN C SMITH
Defendant:
NANCY PELOSI and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montenegro v. US Secret Service et al
as 1:2020cv20121
Defendant:
US Secret Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Nancy Pelosi
Plaintiff:
Khriss Leonardo Montenegro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GILBERT v. TRUMP et al
as 4:2019cv00072
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, 3RD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG IVAN GILBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
