Cases 1 - 10 of 140
Hatter v. DART et al
as 1:2024cv04735
Plaintiff:
Daneka Hatter
Defendant:
THOMAS DART, Supt. Cintron, Sgt. Skinner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Charles v. The Chicago Police Department
as 1:2024cv04593
Plaintiff:
Shaun Raymond Charles and Shawn Raymond Charles
Defendant:
The Chicago Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J.B.H. v. Knox County et al
as 4:2024cv04096
Plaintiff:
J. B. H.
Defendant:
Knox County, Raymond A. Cavanaugh, Bridget E. Pletz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Higgs v. Urbanski et al
as 1:2024cv02252
Plaintiff:
Jayden Higgs
Defendant:
Raymond Urbanski, Roger Farias, Gabriel Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benitez v. Bogucki et al
as 1:2023cv16896
Plaintiff:
Francisco Benitez
Defendant:
Jerome Bogucki, Raymond Schalk, Paul Zacharias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carrasco et al v. City of Joliet et al
as 1:2023cv15572
Plaintiff:
Adela Carrasco, Eric Raya, Kiera Martinez and others
Defendant:
City of Joliet, A. Adams, Lawrence Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Myles v. Wojcik et al
as 1:2023cv14280
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Myles
Defendant:
Anthony Wojcik, Robert Rutherford, Kevin McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
