Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Florestal et al v. City of Hollywood et al
as 0:2023cv61930
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Florestal and Bill D. Alcius
Defendant:
City of Hollywood and Party City Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Holmes v. Indian River Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2023cv14287
Plaintiff:
Ryan Jeffrey Holmes
Defendant:
Indian River Sheriff Office, Sheriff Deryl Loar, Deputy Christian Mathisen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ESTATE OF LANE CAVINESS et al v. Atlas Air, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv23519
Plaintiff:
Patrick Akerlund, Michael Alzati, Eric Anderson and others
Defendant:
JASON FRISBIE, ROBERT GIUDICE, ANDREAS KOUSTAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv60548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Alcius et al v. Grontenhuis et al
as 0:2022cv60386
Plaintiff:
Bill Dieudonne Alcius, Ricardo Florestal and Bill D. Alcius
Defendant:
Joshua Grontenhuis, Ryan Rillo, Bryan Kalish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schaeffer v. Bevil et al
as 8:2021cv02636
Plaintiff:
Glenn John Schaeffer
Defendant:
Sean Bevil, Paige Tucker, Ricardo Alves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv22151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
