Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Whitfield v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04667
Plaintiff:
Corris A Whitfield
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Officer John J. Salinas, Anthony Rojas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Angers et al v. Chavez et al
as 1:2023cv02242
Plaintiff:
Megan Angers, Jamey Arnold, Adriana Antunez and others
Defendant:
#14182 Jesse Chavez, #5442 Mark Styczynski, #3809 Kyle Gleeson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Civil Rights
Darko v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2021cv06467
Plaintiff:
Ernest K Darko
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Anfernee Ixcot, Jose Roman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Comer v. Salinas et al
as 1:2021cv04457
Plaintiff:
Quantrell Comer
Defendant:
Police Officer John J. Salinas, Police Officer A. Rojas and City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Department et al
as 1:2018cv01493
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clayton and Sarah Clayton
Defendant:
Richard Piek, Jerry Crisp, Richard Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lenoir v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv00974
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lenoir
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Noel Esquivel and Carlos Rojas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez Rojas v. Perez
as 1:2017cv02454
Plaintiff:
Teresa Martinez Rojas
Defendant:
Roberto Huerta Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Buneta et al v. Fairmont City IL et al
as 3:2016cv00794
Plaintiff:
Cheyenne C Buneta and Terry Buneta
Defendant:
Fairmont City Illinois , Teresa Suarez , Rojas Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rojas v. X Motorsport, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02982
Plaintiff:
Edwin Rojas
Defendant:
X Motorsport, Inc., Officer Banaszewski , Village of Villa Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crockett v. Chicago et al
as 1:2015cv08757
Plaintiff:
James Crockett
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Jerry Crisp, Brandon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
