Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111
Strassell v. Walcher et al
as 1:2017cv02297
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Strassell
Defendant:
David C. Walcher , Arapahoe County Sheriff Department , Derrick M Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinter v. Loper
as 1:2016cv00262
Plaintiff:
Deborah Sue Pinter
Defendant:
Rosemary Loper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thome et al v. Cook et al
as 1:2011cv03320
Plaintiff:
Penelope Thome and Dennis W. Thome
Defendant:
Alan (I) L. Cook , Alan L. Cook , Susan (I) L. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray et al v. University of Colorado Hospital Authority et al
as 1:2009cv02458
Plaintiff:
Jimmie (I) Louise Gray, Jimmie Louise Gray, Teresa Leeper and others
Defendant:
University of Colorado Hospital Authority, University of Colorado Hospital, Mark (I) Spitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Archuleta et al v. Correctional Healthcare Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02477
Plaintiff:
Brandon Archuleta, Brandon Archuleta, Rosemary Archuleta and others
Defendant:
Correctional Healthcare Management, Inc., Janet (I) Dehler, Janet Dehler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mitchell v. Hara et al
as 1:2008cv01388
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Mitchell
Defendant:
Cheryl Hara, D. Rico Munn, Rosemary McCool and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Murroni v. Abbott et al
as 1:2007cv01718
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Murroni
Defendant:
James E. Abbott, (I) Nix, Nix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
