Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Dunham v. Secret Service
as 6:2026cv01274
Plaintiff:
Jacob Dunham
Defendant:
Secret Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Denton v. Kansas Department for Aging and Disability Services et al
as 6:2026cv01263
Plaintiff:
Adam Michael Denton
Defendant:
Kansas Department for Aging and Disability Services, Laura Howard, Robin Lohman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Civil Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02491
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Williams v. Kansas City Police Department et al
as 5:2026cv04072
Defendant:
Western Guaranty Fund Services, Kansas City Police Department, Jason Asper and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Auld v. United States of America et al
as 2:2026cv02303
Plaintiff:
Stuart Nichols Auld
Defendant:
General Services Administration, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02293
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
